IdrA vs Naama

I really like the dual cast, keep doing it :)

Idra was just playing starcraft alone on the last game 33 muta 20 banelings and 60 lings vs 33 marines an 3 tanks, it's an overkill



It is really the best example of cast - double screen, very good video quality, even on 480. Respect.



There's no way Idra didn't know how far ahead he was in Game 3 for the last 5 minutes. It really seemed like he was holding off on the final blow in order to humiliate Naama. lol...



2nd caster got all of four words in :(

Keep it up though!



@3 Have you ever actually seen IdrA play a zvt? He's patient anc cautious in every game he wins and generally loses when he rushes to end it. Thorzain plays almsot the exact same way... see his games vs Stephano for proof.



Game 3 was awful, notice how naama sacced a handful of SCVs early in the game in a bronze league wtf move. Hydra missed it too. Thumbs down.



Don't understand why there's such a high rating. All three games extremely one-sided and one-dimensional.

Naama took huge risks in all three games. I think it's clear he knew that in a stand up game Idra would take it (there's no shame in that, though).



3rd game was kind of silly. I guess no one can blame them for playing it out the way they did (cautious by idra, persistent by naama) but it definitely should've ended earlier, either by Idra just killing him off or by Naama just leaving after he lost his semi-all-in without doing ANY damage.

Also when Idra got his first 10 or 15 mutas the terran didn't even have an engineering bay, he could've easily ended the game by hitting either mineral line but instead screwed around with the 10 marines standing on the xel'naga tower for like a minute and a half while Naama got proper defenses in his base...

new comment
Only registered and logged in users can post comments.